Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Why I Know What I know

Why I Know What I Know





Posted on Facebook by Bob Self Photo by Joe Milanese

June 16, 2012
Revised May 24, 2013

A simple indisputable statement of the truth.  That it even needs to be stated is a testimony of how far our values have degenerated. One generation ago the truth was oriented by honesty, integrity, The Golden Rule (the basis of all major religions), and the ability to survive.  Under the toxic narcotic-like trance of television, we have become a nation addicted to instant gratification; worshipers of youth and celebrity, undisciplined and self destructive.  Celebrities that openly abuse themselves are held up as heroes and heroines, as their pleasure-seeking causes them to need more and more stimulation to get the addicts buzz. They use drugs to tolerate the stress, which weakens them even more resulting in a downward spiral that leads to death.  Then ,they are elevated another notch in the pop culture for successful suicide.  Suicide is the ultimate in non-adaptive behavior.  It is an instant defiance to our most basic instinct: survival.  The fact that part of our culture is embracing this is a dire sign. 

This entire transformation was caused by television in a process that is now understood in detail to the molecular level.  In brief, TV bombards our nervous system with vast amounts of information that we have evolved no defense mechanisms to protect ourselves. We thought TV was harmless and the novelty of it caused the whole culture to watch it daily and routinely, unaware of the profound way it was changing our nervous systems and affecting our behavior.  Basically to reduce the amount of excess stimuli we became incapable of paying attention to anything else.  We ignored our schools, our government, our spouses, children and families.  It opened the door to manipulation; and, sociopaths who care for nothing but themselves quickly took advantage of the situation.  Americans in the 50's had the benefit of an economy that easily provided all their basic needs.  So to make money, the sociopaths made up products that no one needed; and ,through the hypnotic media of television, convinced Americans to buy this junk.  Success with small inexpensive items soon led to more outrageous and expensive items and fast-growing profits for the opportunists.  Doesn't everyone need a new Cadillac every year ? After all, your neighbors a new car every year.  Soon this addiction to t.v. and the products advertised led men to work overtime and women to leave the home to work in order to pay for the items they didn't need.  With that phase, the opportunists invented credit so people could buy even more stuff they didn't need.  Simultaneously, satisfaction with life declined along with family life, because no one had time or attention for the issues that used to be important.  Now, making money and consuming unneeded stuff was the rule.  People were stuck at jobs they hated in order  to be certain they could make the mortgage payments.  Thus, for the last generation we have been brutally exploited, while becoming mentally ill because of TV and a toxic life style taught to us by television.  Exercise declined; obesity went up.  Now some of us are waking up from a 30 year dream and asking "How did everything get so messed up".  The answer is so shockingly unexpected that people have trouble understanding it or accepting it, much less doing anything about it.  The first step is incredibly simple, but people can't even do that: get the televisions out of the house.

I am an oddball in that I have not watched TV since I was 20 years old.  I read Marshall McCluhan's prophetic book "The Medium is the Message" in which he warned of the dangers of television in 1960.  His reasoning was exactly as I described above.  I was born an "out of the box" thinker, and had no trouble taking action on this warning, even though I know of no another person of my baby-boomer generation who did.  So at 64, I have spent the last 40+ years reading books on any subject that had new breakthroughs in thinking.  Meanwhile, my peers were watching TV and suffering the exact consequences that McCluhan predicted:  through heroin like addictive quality they fell prey to the Madison Avenue boys who created junk no one needed and convinced them to buy it.  Consumerism was born as the sociopaths quickly recognized that TV was the ultimate tool to manipulate people into doing things that added no real value to their lives.  McCluhan also predicted that TV watchers would loose specific mental capabilities: the ability to decide what was important in life and an erosion of the ability to think critically.  In brief, TV, believed to be a harmless source of entertainment, was the cause of the unraveling of all of Americas valued institutions in one generation.  Everything from education, to communities, and , most importantly ,  our political system, which is now totally controlled by sociopaths at every level of government.

All of McCluhans theories had been proven without any doubt by psychiatrists and neuroscientists by around 2003.  The proof was compelling, from the genetics to the intraneuronal cleft where neurotransmitters do the work of transferring information from one neuron to the other.  The level of proof and certainty was also applied to the sociopath, which exists in precisely 0.9 % of every population on the planet. This means that this radical personality disorder, (people who are born without the brain machinery necessary to tell right from wrong), has been part of humanity for millions of years.  These people have been the human source of Evil (in Christian terms) throughout the history of mankind.  Now for the first time in history we have a way to recognize them and isolate them from the rest of society.  This would mean a peaceful world without war or humans cruelty to other humans is possible for the first time in the history of our species.  Sociologists have done some excellent studies and estimate that this <1% of the population is responsible for 99% of the misery for the other 99% of the population.

The 90's were a blast because the breakthroughs in biology and neuroscience were coming monthly for several years.  It has been called "The Decade of the Brain" in the scientific community.  I was totally prepared for the new insights into the biology of human behavior.  I had already figured that out, because as a physician, I learned this from observation and treating mental illness which reinforced the fascinating new information I was reading.  Then the final phase of my learning about the importance of biology in human behavior came when I worked at the largest mental hospital in Texas from 2002-2010.  Now, it's time to share what I have learned in a lifetime of having a different point of view uncontaminated by television, as well as reading a newly published book on any new development in thinking in any arena every 2 weeks for 25 years.  Thus, my scientific and philosophical knowledge is deep and wide.  I have 4000 hardback books in my personal library, most of them are about breakthroughs in scientific and philosophical thought (for example the complete works of Ken Wilber---the most accomplished philosopher of our era). As an undergraduate, I accumulated 192 credit hours, mostly in science. I changed majors three times.  My BS is in Radio-TV-Film, and those studies led me to reading Marshall McCluhans masterwork The Medium Is the Message, and develop a passion for photography, which I have studied and practice vigorously ever since 1969.  I have developed a very distinctive style, which is best described as Impressionistic Street Photography.  You can view my 25,000 images posted on Flickr since 2008.  Flickr ID:
mcreedonmcvean

You can read my essays: www.biologybehaviorchaos.blogspot.com




Self Portrait with Window Reflections

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Tribute to Macklemore and Ryan Lewis


Tribute to Macklemore and Ryan Lewis
Response to a comment on Facebook
May 15, 2013

Just look at the popularity among 18-25 year olds with vintage clothing, that can be purchased for a pittance at "Thrift Shops" (as pointed out in the smash hit by the same name by the hottest band in music Macklemore and Ryan Lewis---this catchy up beat hip-hop track off of their album "The Heist" ---meaning our basic human values have been stolen by corporate consumerism society).  The theme of the song is a "fuck you" to the entire "fashion" industry performed in a totally charming manner with no bitterness.  While most of the tracks deal with major personal or societal issue with a refreshing honesty, the album leaves the listener with a very up beat mood.  Quite an accomplishment in the music industry, which aggressively suppresses creativity in favor of what has worked in the past.  This has made mainstream music formulaic and boring.  But Macklemore (Ben Hagerty of pure Irish descent, who inherited the Irish spirit of rebellion against a more powerful adversary (the British) and refused to play by the industry's rules.)  Therefore, they are an independent label and a highly unlikely pair of white guys from Seattle (a city with a strong history of innovation despite the lack of approval of the power centers of business in NYC), hardly a hot spot for rap music.  They make it immediately among the black community and what white teenager doesn't listen to rap?  Now, they have crossed over, and are popular with the white adult market, thanks to Ellen DeGeneres, and appearance on SML, Letterman and other top mainline shows which often features new talent.

 This is just the beginning for this band whose talent and creativity runs broad and deep.  They could revive not only rap, but also the entire music industry.  The likes of which we haven't seen since The Beatles.  Yes, they are that good. No one can tell them what to do, which means they can't be stopped.  They have the right message in a culture crying out for truth and honesty, which is their main mission. AND they accomplish their mission in a very brilliant and entertaining way.  What more could you ask for in popular music???  Oh, yes.  They have had their share of failure, and dont take themselves seriously.  They are very unlikely to be seduced

Morris Creedon-McVean

PS My gratitude to my son, J now 35 y/o, who has been a rap aficionado since age 13.  He knows more about hip-hop culture and music than all but the black-Americans who were the early proponents of the music and culture, like Quincy Jones.  He gave me the Heist shortly after its release some short 6 months ago.

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

The Artificial Glow of American Cities



The Beautiful Artificial Glow of American Cities
Reply to Dave’s comment on the image below
Posted on Flickr on April 2, 2013


The Glow of Austin from 10 Miles to the Northeast
 
Dave, I too love that glow to the horizon.  These conditions are so common here, that they are often the subject of an entire night's shooting session/therapeutic walk.  I must have 1000 shots of the artificial glow of Austin.  The foreground is used as props (hopefully interesting) to help show off the glow; like some of the Dave's curves images, but that pattern is so strong that it becomes the main subject and the sky takes on the supporting role and it is a strong one.  Same goes at times for the "end of the road" series, although it is to the east, and the glow is not strong enough to be very noticeable very often.  While no one responsible for lighting our cities so lavishly ever considered this glow phenomena visible to outlying areas, it is an unanticipated positive consequence.  Many people enjoy this indirect view of our cities, but they rarely mention it verbally.  Only us intense photographers who consciously look for such things, as some of us will use anything in the environment to make a satisfying image.  So, three cheers to us, a small legion of the population who notice such subtle beauty and capture it so others can enjoy the beauty of it.  Never before has American culture needed artists to make and keep us aware of the beauty in our world, which at times can be seen as just ugliness, stress, and an ever growing number of problems that we feel powerless to cope with.

Monday, September 17, 2012

Why Rain Doesn't Always Help Us


Why Rainfall Doesn’t Always Help Us
September 17, 2012


Why rainfall doesn't help us. The geological structure of the greater Austin area is composed of a base of limestone, because most of Texas was the bottom of an ancient lake. Most of the greater Austin area has a very thin layer of topsoil, averaging as little as 4 to 6 inches; and underneath that, solid limestone. This is especially true of the Hill country, which makes up the majority of the watersheds for our 2 main reservoirs, lakes Austin and Buchanan. Because of this geological structure, rainfall general measurements are a poor indicator of the amount of water that ends up in our reservoirs. Our predominant rainfall comes in the form of thunderstorms, which produce brief but torrential rains. The initial 20 min. or so of what is called a gully washer, is quickly absorbed by the dry and parched topsoil. The water fall after that rapidly runs off and ends up in the Gulf of Mexico. So, unless the generalized pattern of scattered thunderstorms produces a storm directly over the relatively small watershed areas of the 2 reservoirs, it adds nothing to our water reserves. Since we live in a County with a high population density, approximately 1.7 million people in the greater Austin area, we are totally dependent on these reservoirs for a constant steady and reliable source of water. To make matters worse, the growth of this area has been in the high tech sector which has attracted people from all over the United States and abroad for these jobs in cutting edge high tech industries. Included, in the high-tech sector are many semi-conductor fabrication plants (approximately 14 in number). These “chip fabs”, as they are called in the industry, use phenomenal amounts of water in their manufacturing process. For example, it takes over 800 gallons of highly purified water to rinse a single 8 inch silicone wafer. Each of these factories produce thousands of wafers every day. An article on the subject, estimated that an average chip fab used an amount of water that would support a city of over 50,000 people. Therefore, these drought conditions with ever declining water levels in our reservoirs puts these chip fab factories in jeopardy. Since they represent enormous capital investment to build and maintain, and require a very highly educated and sophisticated workforce, they have tremendous leverage on the local economy, and thus the politicians who stake their careers on Austin's reputation on a national level as a high tech center which produces a constant stream of highly placed  well-paying jobs.

It has become increasingly evident that this conflict of interest between the high-tech industries that attract people to this area, and the normal and unavoidable need for water to sustain life and maintain other facilities that make Austin such a wonderful place to live within its beautiful lakes and parks and other amenities. This conflict produced a dramatic example last year, 2011, the hottest and driest year in the state of Texas ever recorded.  In spite of the miserable relentless heat, Travis County saw 26,000 people move into the area from all over the country. Then last winter, nature gave us an unexpected break from the relentless heat and lack of rainfall, and we were blessed with 7 straight months of average rainfall. And the result, which is counter intuitive, we saw our reservoirs levels went down. There can be no mistake about the data, for the lake levels are measured several times a day by state of the art techniques using feet above sea level as the standard.  This data is published daily on the LCRA (Lower Colorado River Authority) web sight.
The meaning of this is clear, we have simply outgrown what nature will give us in terms of replacing the water that we use from our reservoirs. And I repeat, these 2 reservoirs are our only source of water. The problem is of course not purely a growth issue, but partially due to the fact that only a very specific pattern of rainfall adds a significant amount of water to our reservoirs. Generally speaking, the predominant rainfall pattern comes in the form of scattered thunderstorms, is almost useless. The only rainfall pattern that can be counted on to enter the reservoirs is a slow gentle constant rainfall over a large part of the greater Austin area, which we just experienced over this past weekend, September 15-17.

This is exactly the common rainfall pattern in Seattle Washington. I know this well because I lived there for 20 years. Seattle only receives about 42 inches of rain per year, which is about the same as Houston Texas, and only slightly more than the Dallas Fort Worth area. Yet, the average tree, which is a Douglas fir, is 150 feet tall with trunks 3 feet in diameter. And these are 2nd growth trees. The trees that were present when the loading industry arrived averaged between 250 and 300 feet in height. An average tall tree in any Texas urban area averages about 50 feet, and these trees have the benefit of irrigation. The point of all this is that the slow heavy drizzle type rainfall is so much more effective for plant life, that when compared to a radically different pattern of rainfall such as our scattered thunderstorm, it renders evaluating drought in terms of average rainfall almost completely useless. When assessing drought conditions, and the chances of recovery or worsening of those conditions, rainfall patterns and population density must be weighted at least as much as measurements of total rainfall. None of the standard rainfall maps that are thrown in our faces by the Austin-American newspaper consider anything but soil moisture. The originals of this type of map made sense when the population was spread out into small town's and the dominant industry was agriculture. Our local newspaper ran a front-page story about a month ago stating the case that the drought was getting better. They published a map from an institution that I was not familiar with. I looked it up, and the source was a research organization in Omaha, Nebraska, whose main concern is the soil moisture as it affects their main agricultural products: hogs, corn & soybeans.  Their database covered the entire country and our newspaper selected a portion that included Central Texas which do make it appear that drought conditions were improved.  But this is intentional deception, clearly meant to soften local concerns about our drought. We grow computer chips here, not hogs or soybeans and maybe a tiny bit of corn. As far as I know, and though I readily admit I am not an expert on the history of Travis County. But I do have a good working knowledge of horticulture, and I know that you  can not grow vigorous crops of corn or soy beans on 6 inches of top soil.  The situation a few miles to the northeast of Round Rock (home of Dell Computer), in the area around Hutto and Taylor, the soil is rich and deep and is some of the most productive in the state.  However, that area shares our water shortage and an 8 foot pipeline to supply Hutto with water has just been completed.

As far as I know, there has never been an agricultural basis for the economy here in Travis County. Austin has always been an intellectual and political power center, propelled by the large state government and the huge and highly ranked University of Texas. Since I attended there in the 1960s, this prestigious university have and still has 55,000 students, including over 20,000 graduate students whose research before and after graduation brings in countless dollars and corporate investment and facilities. The highly trained and sophisticated PhD's produce a virtual endless stream of talent for any company doing any type of research and development. Therefore, comparing the rainfall and it's affect on the economy of the agricultural based small town of Omaha Nebraska, to the intellectual research and development mecca with a population of over 30 times the size of Omaha is laughable, as well as being deceptive.  It is disturbing that Perry and his allies stoop to cheap tricks to deceive the public about the level of danger that brewing and getting worse by the day.

I we the people of Travis County do not wake up and see clearly that we are rapidly running out of water, in as soon a six months; AND absolutely nothing is being done to mitigate the situation.   There are not even in plans in the making as to what emergency measures need to be taken IF we run out of water (which is a as close to a scientific certainty as is possible).  We are in a long term drought pattern with no end in sight, and we use much more on a daily basis the the reservoirs can supply, even given an occasional  break from nature.

Climactic change which produces less resources in the form of rain and food production, in a culture whose economic system based on a need for constant growth, and the need for essentially endless recourses, is a conflict so basic it is bound to be profoundly disruptive.  But WE humans must adapt to these changes or we will perish.  No better argument for conservation and “living within your means” has ever been made that the current situation in Central Texas where I live.  It is a heart wrenching process to watch.  We are being tested by nature, and at this point it appears to me that we are going to fail.  But Texans and all of humanity have risen to the demands of worse situations that this, so I remain hopeful.

Morris Creedon-McVean