Peter Whybrow, MD
“The Well-Tuned Brain”
A way out of our trap.
May 29, 2015
Today, I received from Amazon
a book that I have been waiting for since Dr. Whybrow wrote “American Mania:
When More Is Not Enough” in 2005. At
that time, his brilliant effort was the only book that explained the many
breakthroughs in neuroscience, and he made since of the implications of what
was known at that time. He also
indicated the direction that cutting edge research was going, and some
speculation as to where this ongoing research would carry us in our
understanding of ourselves, and what changes were needed.
The biology of human behavior
is turning our perception of ourselves and our species, Homo sapiens,
upside-down and inside out. Most of what
we learned in school is at least half wrong (for example our behavior and our
moods and ideas were based on a
psychological model, which was a number of schools of thought all based on the
work of Freud). Since, the early ‘90s,
the biology of human behavior has been the hottest area of research in all of
science, recently joined in the late 2000’s, by climatology as the world wide
events like Katrina, awakened us to the disruptive threat climactic change
represented.
The book: “2052: A global
Forecast for the Next Forty Years” by Jorgen Randers, who spent his career as a
top level consultant for the biggest financial institutions in the world, like
the IMF. He made a compelling case that
Global Warming was no only “real”, but threatened to trigger a mass extinction
(95+% of the biological organisms living today, including us. Every climatologist in the world agreed with
his assessment, except the exact date this catastrophe would occur, simply
because nothing like this has ever happened before. Most startling was the fact that is well
proven, is that our species is the sole cause of the Global Warming, by burning
fossil fuels at a hectic pace which has increased at an exponential pace in the
20th Century. Whybrow fills
in the one major factor missing from Rander’s analysis: the contribution of the
biology of human behavior in this alarming trend. We have become addicted to energy wasting
activities, including the purchase and collection of stuff that is not only
unnecessary for survival, but degrades our health and happiness. So in essence, Whybrow fills in a huge gap in
Rander’s otherwise impeccable assessment.
Whybrow’s conclusions also add the essential element of HOPE, to what
otherwise seems to be an impossible task.
Give or take a few years, our species all around the world has little
more than one generation to totally change our economies from a growth and
consumer basis, to one based on sustainable technologies. Ironically, many of the big time bankers with
whom Randers worked were sociopaths, and being uneducated in the biological
sciences or psychiatry, he was oblivious to that fact.
After, reading the table of
contents, and the first page of each chapter, the book is everything I
expected. It is lock to win the Nobel
Prize, just as Diamond’s “Guns, Germs and Steel”, which opened our eyes to the
role of biology played in history, and was completely ignored in the “history”
we were taught in school which was based on political and military issues (even
economics were ignored).
It is fascinating that
practicing physicians (I am a retired primary care physician) have largely
ignored books like Diamonds, Oliver Sacks (a neurologists), “A Brain for All
Seasons” by William Calvin, a neurologist in Seattle, who proposed that
adapting to climactic changes like the ice ages, force our species to get
smarter and learn to adapt or perish, and Whybrow’s earlier books: “A Mood Apart” written in 1995, which was and
still is the best book on depression ever written.
There are several factors in
this ignoring of these consciousness expanding books. First, they are not written targeted to the
medical world, but seek to strike a balance between the average American with
an interest in science, and the medical profession. This requires a very sophisticated writing
style, and physicians are not taught to write in the same way a professional
writer writes with style and substance.
Physicians, in writing to have their research reported published focus
on the facts, and an actual writing “style” is actually considered a
distraction for the all important FACTS revealed in their research. Even speculation about the meaning of the
facts revealed in their research is discouraged, as it is considered irrelevant
to the purpose of the paper.
So, scientist writers must
have skills that they either were born with or that they learned somewhere
outside of medicine. It was only in the
90’s when brain research was developing so rapidly, that researchers in one
aspect of the brain hardly had time to read the publications in their own
narrow area of interest, and more generalized papers were ignored, that the
physicians with the elite writing skills were willing to the professional risk
of writing books targeted to both the general public and their colleagues. It is not common knowledge that this
reluctance existed since those with the skills and courage to write to a twin
targeted audience has been so wildly popular.
Diamond’s book won the Nobel Prize, which was very encouraging others to
“follow in his footsteps.”
Please read Whybrow’s
books. Our survival is at stake, and
everyone must join in the fight, or we are unlikely to succeed/survive.
MORRIS CREEDON-MCVEAN, DO
A gentleman and a scholar
May 29th, 2015
Austin,
Texas
Texas
No comments:
Post a Comment